FILTER RECORDS BY
Haygarth J (1800)
Of the imagination, as a cause and as a cure of disorders of the body: exemplified by fictitious tractors, and epidemical convulsions. Bath: R. Crutwell.
View
Haygarth J (1784)
An inquiry into how to prevent smallpox. Chester and London.
View
Haygarth J (1805)
A clinical history of diseases 1. Acute rheumatism. 2. Nodosity of the joints. London: Cadell and Davies.
View
Haygarth J (1803)
A letter to Dr Percival on the prevention of infections, fevers… Annals of Medicine. Vol II, Lustrum II, 51-78.
View
Haygarth J (1793)
Sketch of a plan to exterminate the casual smallpox from Great Britain; and to introduce general inoculation. London: J Johnson
View
Lettsom JC (1775)
On the improvement of medicine in London on the basis of public good. London: Phillips.
View
Percival T (1788)
Essays medical, philosophical and experimental Vol 1.4th ed. Warrington: Eyres, for London: Johnson.
View
Percival T (1803)
Medical ethics or, a code of institutes and precepts adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. Manchester: S Russell for J Johnson.
View
Falconer W (1807)
A practical dissertation on the effects of the medicinal effects of the Bath waters. London and Bath: Robinson & Crutwell. 3rd edition Bath: Meyler and London: Robinson, pp 29, 40-41, 50-52, 72-74, 99, 101, 106, 115-116, 117, 124.
View
Lettsom JC (1774)
Medical memoirs of the General Dispensary in London. London: for the Author.
View
Show
Booth CC† (2002).
John Haygarth FRS (1740-1827). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Boylston AW (2012).
John Haygarth’s 18th century ‘Rules of Prevention’ for eradicating smallpox. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Tröhler U (2020)
Probabilistic thinking and the evaluation of therapies, 1700-1900. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Tröhler U (2010).
The introduction of numerical methods to assess the effects of medical interventions during the 18th century: a brief history. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Donaldson IML (2016).
Antoine de Lavoisier’s role in designing a single-blind trial to assess whether ‘Animal Magnetism’ exists. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Mirza RD, Punja S, Vohra S, Guyatt G (2017).
The history and development of N of 1 trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Kirakosian R, Möllenbrink L, Zamore G, Kaptchuk TJ, Jensen K (2023).
Heresy, witchcraft, Jean Gerson, scepticism, and the use of placebo controls. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Boylston AW (2012).
The origins of vaccination: no inoculation, no vaccination. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Wartolowska K, Beard DJ, Carr AJ (2017).
The use of placebos in controlled trials of surgical interventions: a brief history. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Moore W (2009).
John Hunter: learning from natural experiments, ‘placebos’, and the state of mind of a patient in the 18th century. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Kaptchuk TJ (2011).
A brief history of the evolution of methods to control observer biases in tests of treatments. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Senn SJ, Chalmers I (2021).
Giving and taking: ethical treatment assignment in controlled trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Tröhler U (2003).
James Lind and the evaluation of clinical practice. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
Tröhler U (2003).
John Clark 1780 & 1792: learning from properly kept records. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.
View
1.1 Why treatment uncertainties should be addressed
View
2.4 The need to avoid differences in the way treatment outcomes are assessed
View
2.9 Recognizing researcher/sponsor biases and fraud
View
3.1 Recording and interpreting numbers in testing treatments
View
Diferencias en la manera en que se evalúan los resultados de los tratamientos
View
Diferenças na maneira como os resultados dos tratamentos são avaliados
View
Différences dans la façon dont les résultats des traitements sont évalués
View
Por que os experimentos controlados são necessários?
View
Por qué se necesitan pruebas auténticas
View
Pourquoi des essais contrôlés sont-ils nécessaires
View
Почему необходимы объективные тесты
View
Различия в способах оценки результатов лечения
View
الاختلافات بين الطريقة التي يجري بها تقيـيم المعالجات
View
السبب وراء الحاجة إلى الاختبارات غير المتحيزة
View
Nothing found, please try resetting your search filters