Search results for “haygarth”

FILTER CLEAR FILTERS

SORT author date relevance


FILTER RECORDS BY


Falconer W (1807)
A practical dissertation on the effects of the medicinal effects of the Bath waters. London and Bath: Robinson & Crutwell. 3rd edition Bath: Meyler and London: Robinson, pp 29, 40-41, 50-52, 72-74, 99, 101, 106, 115-116, 117, 124.

View

Haygarth J (1800)
Of the imagination, as a cause and as a cure of disorders of the body: exemplified by fictitious tractors, and epidemical convulsions. Bath: R. Crutwell.

View

Haygarth J (1784)
An inquiry into how to prevent smallpox. Chester and London.

View

Haygarth J (1805)
A clinical history of diseases 1. Acute rheumatism. 2. Nodosity of the joints. London: Cadell and Davies.

View

Haygarth J (1803)
A letter to Dr Percival on the prevention of infections, fevers… Annals of Medicine. Vol II, Lustrum II, 51-78.

View

Haygarth J (1793)
Sketch of a plan to exterminate the casual smallpox from Great Britain; and to introduce general inoculation. London: J Johnson

View

Lettsom JC (1775)
On the improvement of medicine in London on the basis of public good. London: Phillips.

View

Lettsom JC (1774)
Medical memoirs of the General Dispensary in London. London: for the Author.

View

Percival T (1788)
Essays medical, philosophical and experimental Vol 1.4th ed. Warrington: Eyres, for London: Johnson.

View

Percival T (1803)
Medical ethics or, a code of institutes and precepts adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. Manchester: S Russell for J Johnson.

View

Show


Booth CC† (2002).
John Haygarth FRS (1740-1827). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Boylston AW (2012).
John Haygarth’s 18th century ‘Rules of Prevention’ for eradicating smallpox. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Boylston AW (2012).
The origins of vaccination: no inoculation, no vaccination. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Donaldson IML (2016).
Antoine de Lavoisier’s role in designing a single-blind trial to assess whether ‘Animal Magnetism’ exists. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Kaptchuk TJ (2011).
A brief history of the evolution of methods to control observer biases in tests of treatments. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Kirakosian R, Möllenbrink L, Zamore G, Kaptchuk TJ, Jensen K (2023).
Heresy, witchcraft, Jean Gerson, scepticism, and the use of placebo controls. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Mirza RD, Punja S, Vohra S, Guyatt G (2017).
The history and development of N of 1 trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Moore W (2009).
John Hunter: learning from natural experiments, ‘placebos’, and the state of mind of a patient in the 18th century. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Senn SJ, Chalmers I (2021).
Giving and taking: ethical treatment assignment in controlled trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Tröhler U (2003).
James Lind and the evaluation of clinical practice. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Tröhler U (2003).
John Clark 1780 & 1792: learning from properly kept records. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Tröhler U (2010).
The introduction of numerical methods to assess the effects of medical interventions during the 18th century: a brief history. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Tröhler U (2020)
Probabilistic thinking and the evaluation of therapies, 1700-1900. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Wartolowska K, Beard DJ, Carr AJ (2017).
The use of placebos in controlled trials of surgical interventions: a brief history. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

1.1 Why treatment uncertainties should be addressed

View

2.4 The need to avoid differences in the way treatment outcomes are assessed

View

2.9 Recognizing researcher/sponsor biases and fraud

View

3.1 Recording and interpreting numbers in testing treatments

View

Diferencias en la manera en que se evalúan los resultados de los tratamientos

View

Diferenças na maneira como os resultados dos tratamentos são avaliados

View

Différences dans la façon dont les résultats des traitements sont évalués

View

Por que os experimentos controlados são necessários?

View

Por qué se necesitan pruebas auténticas

View

Pourquoi des essais contrôlés sont-ils nécessaires

View

Почему необходимы объективные тесты

View

Различия в способах оценки результатов лечения

View

الاختلافات بين الطريقة التي يجري بها تقيـيم المعالجات

View

السبب وراء الحاجة إلى الاختبارات غير المتحيزة

View

为什么需要进行公平试验

View

治疗结局评价方式的差异

View

Nothing found, please try resetting your search filters