Using the results of systematic reviews

All research has been done in the past, but the results of research need to be used today and tomorrow to inform decisions in health care. Trustworthy evidence from research is necessary, but not sufficient, to improve the quality of health care.


JLL Essay
4.3 Using the results of up-to-date systematic reviews of research

So what makes for better healthcare?

 

FILTER CLEAR FILTERS

SORT date author


FILTER RECORDS BY


Lind J (1753)
A treatise of the scurvy. In three parts. Containing an inquiry into the nature, causes and cure, of that disease. Together with a critical and chronological view of what has been published on the subject. Edinburgh: Printed by Sands, Murray and Cochran for A Kincaid and A Donaldson.

View

Duncan A (1773)
Medical and Philosophical Commentaries. Volume First, Part I. London: J Murray.

View

Leitch I (1959)
The place of analytical and critical reviews in any growing biological science and the service they may render to research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 2 Vols. Washington DC: National Academies Press, p 571-588.

View

Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (1989)
Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View

ACP Journal Club (1991)
Supplement to Annals of Internal Medicine. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, Volume 114, Supplement 1.

View

Sinclair JC, Bracken MB (1992)
Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View

Milne R, Chambers LW (1993)
Brief Communication: How to read a review article. Health Libraries Review 10:38-39.

View

Milne R, Chambers L (1993)
Assessing the scientific quality of review articles. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 47:169-170.

View

Sackett D, Straus S; for Firm A of the Nuffield Department of Medicine (1998)
Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the "Evidence Cart". JAMA 280:1336-1338.

View

Emparanza JI, Cabello JB, Burls AJ. (2015)
Does evidence-based practice improve patient outcomes? An analysis of a natural experiment in a Spanish hospital. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21:1059-1065.

View

Show


Neuhauser D, Diaz M, Chalmers I (2007).
A puzzling omission in a great medical textbook edited by a pioneer of controlled trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Hytten F (2009).
Isabella Leitch’s contributions to the development of systematic reviews of research evidence. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Fox DM (2011).
Systematic reviews and health policy: the influence of a project on perinatal care since 1988. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Milne I (2012).
Who was James Lind, and what exactly did he achieve? JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Bird SM (2014).
The 1959 meeting in Vienna on controlled clinical trials – a methodological landmark. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Straus S, Eisinga A, Sackett D† (2015).
What drove the Evidence Cart? Bringing the library to the bedside. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View