Records
Andersen
L. Jansen’s 1910 use of a single blind experiment to assess the
effects of radioactive water on rheumatic diseases.
Commentary on: Jansen
H. Behandling med Radiumemanation særlig ved gigtiske Lidelser.
[Treatment with radium emanation especially with rheumatic diseases].
Ugeskrift for Læger 1910;72:1333-48.
Cite as: Andersen L (2005). Jansen’s 1910
use of a single blind experiment to assess the effects of radioactive
water on rheumatic diseases. The James Lind Library (www.jameslindlibrary.org).
Accessed
© Lene Andersen, 2005.
Author contact details:
Lene Andersen, Bakkedraget 18, 2 nd. floor, DK- 3400 Hillerød,
Denmark.
E-mail: leneogulrik@privat.dk
In 1910 Jansen published his study on the treatment of arthritis using
radioactive water. He observed what seemed to be a favourable response,
but he was aware that he needed to consider several alternative possible
explanations for his observations: the results might have occurred by
chance, they might have reflected the patients’ suggestibility,
and they might have been caused by concomitant factors, such as hospital
admission, bed rest and diet.
He felt certain that he could exclude the first of these factors –
chance – because of “the constancy with which [the reactions]
occurred and because the timing of the improvements seen in a number of
patients were related to the treatment in such a way that it would be
far fetched to regard them as having occurred by chance.”
He admitted that the third factor – hospital admission, for example
- might be significant, but he tried to reduce its impact, partly by delaying
treatment “until the patients had already been in hospital for a
period of time and until they had received other treatments with unsatisfactory
results,” and partly by treating out-patients as well.
Although Jansen did not use a parallel control group, he did try to address
suggestibility and prevent biased reports of symptom relief by ‘blinding’
some of the patients to the true nature of the treatment and by administering
placebo to others. He tried to minimize the impact of suggestion by providing
patients with different explanations of the nature of the treatment. To
some he suggested that it was a new treatment, something like a “new
tasteless Aspirin”. In others he first gave the patient distilled
water and then, without letting the patient know when, administered the
radioactive water. No ‘blinding’ of the investigator was mentioned,
either because Jansen did not regard this as important, or because he
had not thought of this possibility.
The source of Jansen’s inspiration for these methodological precautions
is not reported, which is a pity because ‘blinding’ and placebo
treatment were rare at the beginning of the 20th century. Neither his
fellow countrymen Finsen or Fibiger had used blinding in their assessments
of light treatment for lupus vulgaris and serum treatment for diphtheria,
respectively (Finsen
1896; Fibiger
1898).
|