Search results for “streptomycin and buberculosis”

FILTER CLEAR FILTERS

SORT author date relevance


FILTER RECORDS BY


Bignall JR, Crofton J (1949)
Antihistamine drugs in the treatment of nausea and vomiting due to streptomycin. BMJ 1:13-14.

View

Long ER, Ferebee SH (1950)
A controlled investigation of streptomycin treatment in tuberculosis. Public Health Reports 65:1421-1451.

View

Jacobs A, Borthwick WM (1950)
Streptomycin in urinary tuberculosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 43:453-466.

View

Show


Bryder L (2010).
The Medical Research Council and clinical trial methodologies before the 1940s: the failure to develop a ‘scientific’ approach. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Chalmers I (2010).
Why the 1948 MRC trial of streptomycin used treatment allocation based on random numbers. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Crofton J† (2007).
Reginald Bignall (1913-2000). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Chalmers I, Clarke M (2002).
J Guy Scadding and the move from alternation to randomization. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Scadding JG (2002).
Reflections on my studies of the effects of sulphonamide drugs in bacillary dysentery in Egypt, 1943-1944. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Farewell V, Johnson A (2017).
Major Greenwood and clinical trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Chalmers I (2010).
Joseph Asbury Bell and the birth of randomized trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Diaz M, Neuhauser D (2004).
Lessons from using randomization to assess gold treatment for tuberculosis. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Doll R (2003).
Controlled trials testing two or more treatments simultaneously. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Wartolowska K, Beard DJ, Carr AJ (2017).
The use of placebos in controlled trials of surgical interventions: a brief history. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Toth B (1998)
Clinical trials in British medicine 1858 – 1948, with special reference to the development of the randomised controlled trial. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Cox DR (2009).
Randomization for concealment. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Zwarenstein M (2016).
‘Pragmatic’ and ‘Explanatory’ attitudes to randomized trials. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Podolsky SH, Davey Smith G (2011).
Park’s story and Winters’ tale: alternate allocation clinical trials in turn of the Century America. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Cox-Maksimov D (1997)
The Making of the Clinical Trial in Britain, 1910-1945: Expertise, the State and the Public. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Altman DG (2017).
Donald Mainland: anatomist, educator, thinker, medical statistician, trialist, rheumatologist. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Rodeck CH (2004).
Geoffrey William Theobald (1896–1977). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Silverman WA† (2003).
Personal reflections on lessons learned from randomized trials involving newborn infants, 1951 to 1967. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Bird SM (2014).
The 1959 meeting in Vienna on controlled clinical trials – a methodological landmark. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Crofton J (2006).
John Crofton (1912-2009). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

Edwards MV (2004)
Control and the therapeutic trial 1918 – 1948. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation.

View

1.2 Why treatment comparisons are essential

View

2.4 The need to avoid differences in the way treatment outcomes are assessed

View

Building the Library

View